wiqqi
Paper

The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy

Also known as The Efficacy of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy, Shedler 2010

Jonathan Shedler's 2010 review: psychodynamic therapy works as well as evidence-based ones

At a glance

Also on this page: Key facts · Links · Sources · Related pages

Why it matters

Key facts

Author
Jonathan Shedler (University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine)1
Published
February 20101
Journal
American Psychologist, vol. 65, issue 2, pp. 98–1091
DOI
10.1037/a00183781
Design
Narrative review of meta-analyses1
Main result
Cites a Cochrane meta-analysis (Abbass et al., 2006) of 23 trials and 1,431 patients: effect size .97 for general symptom improvement, 1.51 at follow-up over nine months2
Comparison
Antidepressants .31 (Turner et al., 2008); CBT for depression, panic and anxiety .68 (Haby et al., 2006)2
Cited by
360 (Europe PMC count, October 2026)1

What it found

  1. Effects as large as other therapies1

    Effect sizes for psychodynamic therapy are as large as those reported for therapies promoted as "empirically supported".

  2. Gains that grow1

    Patients maintain their gains and appear to keep improving after treatment ends.

  3. Shared techniques1

    Non-psychodynamic therapies may work partly because skilled practitioners use psychodynamic techniques.

Key ideas: seven distinctive features

  1. 1. Focus on emotion2

    Helping patients put words to the full range of their feelings, including contradictory or troubling ones.

  2. 2. Exploring avoidance2

    Noticing and exploring the ways people avoid distressing thoughts and feelings.

  3. 3. Recurring patterns2

    Identifying themes that repeat in thoughts, feelings, relationships and life experiences.

  4. 4. The past2

    Discussing past experience to see how it shapes the present.

  5. 5. Relationships2

    A heavy emphasis on the patient's relationships and interpersonal experience.

  6. 6. The therapy relationship2

    Working with the client-therapist relationship, where interpersonal themes tend to reappear.

  7. 7. Wishes and fantasies2

    Encouraging patients to speak freely, so desires, fears, fantasies and dreams come up.

Criticism and limits

  1. Overstated evidence3

    Anestis, Anestis and Lilienfeld (2011): Shedler glosses over methodological details, ignores contrary findings and overstates the evidence.

  2. Criticisms not addressed4

    Thombs, Jewett and Bassel (2011): he did not engage specific criticisms, separate short-term from long-term therapy, or weigh the quality of the meta-analyses.

  3. Whose techniques?5

    Tryon and Tryon (2011) argue that no therapy owns common factors such as the relationship.

Connections

Sources

  1. Shedler J. The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Am Psychol 2010;65(2):98-109 (Europe PMC) (opens europepmc.org)
  2. Shedler J. The Efficacy of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy, pre-publication version revised 9 October 2009 (PDF) (opens briancollinson.ca)
  3. Anestis MD, Anestis JC, Lilienfeld SO. When it comes to evaluating psychodynamic therapy, the devil is in the details. Am Psychol 2011 (Europe PMC) (opens europepmc.org)
  4. Thombs BD, Jewett LR, Bassel M. Is there room for criticism of studies of psychodynamic psychotherapy? Am Psychol 2011 (Europe PMC) (opens europepmc.org)
  5. Tryon WW, Tryon GS. No ownership of common factors. Am Psychol 2011 (Europe PMC) (opens europepmc.org)

Last checked against its sources today

Is something on this page wrong or out of date? Tell us

How recent

The line under a date fills as time passes: empty when new, then one equal share each for a day, a week, a month and a year. For episodes and other items it is full at 2 years; for "last checked", at a year. A striped line means the date is known only to the month or year.