wiqqi
Book

Maternal Care and Mental Health

Also known as Maternal care and mental health, Child Care and the Growth of Love, Bowlby's WHO report

John Bowlby's 1951 WHO report on what children lose when separated from a mother figure

At a glance

Also on this page: Key facts · Links · Sources · Related pages

Why it matters

Key facts

Author
John Bowlby3
Published
19511
Second edition
19523
Publisher
World Health Organization, Monograph Series no. 23
Also printed in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 3, pp. 355–533 (1951)4
ISBN
9241400021 (2nd edition)3
Popular version
Child Care and the Growth of Love (Penguin); a 1965 edition added review chapters by Mary Ainsworth2
Reach
Written in 6 months, translated into 14 languages, 400,000 copies sold in English paperback2
Influence
Changed institutional care of children and let parents visit young children in hospital more often1

What it argues

  1. A child needs one continuous relationship2

    To grow up mentally healthy, an infant needs a warm, intimate, continuous relationship with the mother or a permanent substitute, which both enjoy.

  2. Deprivation comes in degrees5

    Bowlby called the lack of that relationship maternal deprivation: almost complete in many institutions, partial at home, mild with a familiar substitute.

  3. Society must support parents5

    Parents depend on the wider community, so a society that values its children must support their parents, including single mothers.

Key ideas

  1. Mother as the child's ego2

    Bowlby wrote that in early childhood the mother does the child's self-regulation for it, handing those jobs over gradually.

  2. Critical periods2

    He compared the mother to an organizer in embryology, acting on the psyche during certain critical periods.

  3. Bad homes over good institutions5

    His remark that children thrive better in bad homes than in good institutions argued for supporting families rather than removing children.

Examples from the book

  1. The core sentence2

    "...a warm, intimate, and continuous relationship with his mother (or permanent mother substitute) in which both find satisfaction and enjoyment" (p. 13).

  2. Who it covered5

    It dealt with children in institutions, hospitals and foster care, and with policies removing children from unwed mothers and neglected homes.

Criticism and limits

  1. Thin evidence, no theory5

    Critics asked whether the evidence supported the hypothesis; Bowlby later agreed the data fitted no theory of the time.

  2. Privation and deprivation mixed up1

    It did not separate having no attachment figure from losing one, or from the general understimulation of institutions.

  3. Used against working mothers1

    Governments used it to claim any separation harms a child and to discourage mothers from work and day care.

  4. Partly right, often for the wrong reasons5

    Michael Rutter's 1981 reassessment found Bowlby only partially right; separation is one of many risk factors.

  5. Fathers left out5

    Fathers appear only as support for the mother; the 1962 WHO follow-up added a chapter on paternal deprivation.

Connections

Sources

  1. John Bowlby (Wikipedia) (opens en.wikipedia.org)
  2. Bretherton I. The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, Developmental Psychology 1992 (opens psychology.sunysb.edu)
  3. Maternal care and mental health, 2nd ed. (WHO IRIS) (opens iris.who.int)
  4. Bowlby J. Maternal care and mental health, Bull World Health Organ 1951 (Europe PMC) (opens europepmc.org)
  5. Maternal deprivation (Wikipedia) (opens en.wikipedia.org)

Last checked against its sources today

Is something on this page wrong or out of date? Tell us

How recent

The line under a date fills as time passes: empty when new, then one equal share each for a day, a week, a month and a year. For episodes and other items it is full at 2 years; for "last checked", at a year. A striped line means the date is known only to the month or year.