Attachment and Loss
Also known as Attachment and Loss trilogy, Attachment (Attachment and Loss, vol. 1), Separation: Anxiety and Anger, Separation: Anxiety and Anger (vol. 2), Loss: Sadness and Depression, Loss: Sadness and Depression (vol. 3), Attachment, Separation, Loss
John Bowlby's three-volume founding statement of attachment theory (1969, 1973, 1980)
At a glance
What it argues
Attachment is an instinct for protection, Separation explains fear, Loss explains grief and defence
See all 3Key ideas
Behavioral systems instead of drives, Secure base and safe haven, Internal working models …
See all 5Examples from the book
Ploughing Freud's field, The dog between mother and child, Smooth and troubled pairs
See all 3Criticism and limits
Rejected by psychoanalysts, Slow uptake for volumes 2 and 3, Wider objections to the theory
See all 3Read next
Patterns of Attachment, A Secure Base, Attachment Theory in Practice
See all 3Connections
John Bowlby, Attachment theory and 2 others
See all 4
Also on this page: Key facts · Links · Sources · Related pages
- Bowlby's three volumes replace Freud's drive theory with an evolutionary account of why children bond.
- Attachment argues that seeking closeness to a caregiver is an instinct that protected infants from danger.
- Separation explains fear and anxiety, and how children build working models of themselves and others.
- Loss explains grief and how painful information is kept out of awareness.
- Together they founded attachment theory.
Why it matters
- For anyone who wants attachment theory from its source rather than from summaries; therapists still use its ideas of working models and the secure base.
Key facts
- Author
- John Bowlby1
- Volumes
- Attachment (1969), Separation: Anxiety and Anger (1973), Loss: Sadness and Depression (1980)1
- Revised
- Attachment, revised 1982 to add newer research1
- Publishers
- Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis (London); Basic Books (New York)1
- Pages
- Attachment, 464 (Basic Books, 2nd edition)3
- Pages
- Separation, 480 (Basic Books)5
- Pages
- Loss, 496 (Basic Books)6
- ISBN
- Attachment 9780465005437 (Basic Books)3
- ISBN
- Separation 9780465097166 (Basic Books)5
- ISBN
- Loss 9780465042388 (Basic Books)6
- Influence
- Attachment theory became a dominant approach to understanding early social development1
What it argues
-
Attachment is an instinct for protection2
Attachment behavior aims at closeness to a caregiver; its evolutionary job is protecting the infant from danger, not feeding.
-
Separation explains fear2
Children fear both cues to danger and the absence of an attachment figure; separation and the threat of it breed anxiety.
-
Loss explains grief and defence2
Bowlby explains mourning in young children and how painful information gets excluded from awareness.
Key ideas
-
Behavioral systems instead of drives2
Bowlby replaced Freud's psychic energy with goal-corrected control systems borrowed from ethology and cybernetics.
-
Secure base and safe haven2
A child explores from the attachment figure and returns to it for comfort; how well that works depends on the carer's sensitivity.
-
Internal working models2
Children form models of self and attachment figure: valued and reliable when needs were met, unworthy when bids were rejected.
-
Patterns pass down the generations2
Bowlby held that family micro-culture passes on mental health and ill health at least as much as genes do.
-
Defensive exclusion2
Information too painful to think about is kept out of awareness, which splits working models and blocks their updating.
Examples from the book
-
Ploughing Freud's field2
In the preface Bowlby wrote that his field "was no less than the one Freud had started tilling sixty years earlier".
-
The dog between mother and child2
Fleeing danger and fleeing to an attachment figure are separate systems, visible when a fierce dog comes between a mother and her child.
-
Smooth and troubled pairs2
When interaction between a couple runs smoothly each takes pleasure in the other; persistent conflict brings anxiety and unhappiness (vol. 1, p. 242).
Criticism and limits
-
Rejected by psychoanalysts1
Bowlby rejected psychoanalytic accounts of attachment, and psychoanalysts in turn rejected his theory.
-
Slow uptake for volumes 2 and 32
Separation and Loss made less impact than Attachment at first, partly because supporting studies lagged behind.
-
Wider objections to the theory4
Critics fault attachment theory on temperament, measurement, neglect of social complexity and mother-blaming.
Read next
-
Ainsworth's Baltimore study, the main evidence for the trilogy's claims.
-
Bowlby's short lectures applying the theory to parenting and psychotherapy.
-
Sue Johnson turns attachment theory into a therapy for individuals, couples and families.
Connections
Links
Sources
- John Bowlby (Wikipedia) (opens en.wikipedia.org)
- Bretherton I. The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, Developmental Psychology 1992 (opens psychology.sunysb.edu)
- Attachment by John Bowlby (Basic Books / Hachette) (opens hachettebookgroup.com)
- Attachment theory (Wikipedia) (opens en.wikipedia.org)
- Separation by John Bowlby (Basic Books / Hachette) (opens hachettebookgroup.com)
- Loss by John Bowlby (Basic Books / Hachette) (opens hachettebookgroup.com)
Last checked against its sources today
Is something on this page wrong or out of date? Tell us
The line under a date fills as time passes: empty when new, then one equal share each for a day, a week, a month and a year. For episodes and other items it is full at 2 years; for "last checked", at a year. A striped line means the date is known only to the month or year.